University of Illinois Red Flags Rule Best Practices for Units that Provide Goods or Services that Are Paid for Later
Use the guidelines below in conjunction with the main Red Flags Rule Identity-Theft Prevention Program Best Practices, which apply to all units.
What Situations Are Covered?
- Providing goods or services that people can pay for later, whether billed through Banner Accounts Receivable, via payroll deduction, or through any other accounts receivable system administered on behalf of your office
- Requiring payment at the time of sale or service but using another unit’s services to pursue debt collection from nonpaying patrons
If you administer your own accounts or pursue your own debt collection, follow the Red Flags Rule Best Practices for Units that Administer Accounts.
What Are My Unit’s Responsibilities?
Be Able to Recognize Red Flags
Define which patterns, practices, or specific activities indicate the possible presence of identity theft; that is, identify red flags that alert your unit to potential cases. The Rule includes a list of 26 examples of red flags. The following table shows the examples that apply to providing goods and services that are paid for later. Your unit should also monitor for other red flags that you have identified as relevant to your operations. Be sure to report these additional red flags to the Red Flags Steering Committee using the Red Flags Unit Registration and Update form
.
FTC Red Flags Examples—Goods and Services Paid for Later
| Suspicious documents |
- Documents provided for identification appear to have been altered or forged.
- The photograph or physical description on the identification is not consistent with the appearance of the applicant or customer presenting the identification.
- Other information on the identification is not consistent with information provided by the person opening a new covered account or customer presenting the identification.
- Other information on the identification is not consistent with readily accessible information that is on file with [the University/unit], such as a signature card or a recent check.
- An application appears to have been altered or forged, or gives the appearance of having been destroyed and reassembled.
|
|
Suspicious
personal[ly]
identifying information
|
- Personal[ly] identifying information provided is inconsistent when compared against external information sources used by [the University/unit]. For example:
- The address does not match any address in the consumer report; or
- The Social Security Number (SSN) has not been issued, or is listed on the Social Security Administration’s Death Master File.
- Personal[ly] identifying information provided by the customer is not consistent with other personal[ly] identifying information provided by the customer. For example, there is a lack of correlation between the SSN range and date of birth.
- Personal[ly] identifying information provided is associated with known fraudulent activity as indicated by internal or third-party sources used by the [University/unit]. For example:
- The address on an application is the same as the address provided on a fraudulent application; or
- The phone number on an application is the same as the number provided on a fraudulent application.
- Personal[ly] identifying information provided is of a type commonly associated with fraudulent activity as indicated by internal or third-party sources used by [the University/unit]. For example:
- The address on an application is fictitious, a mail drop, or prison; or
- The phone number is invalid, or is associated with a pager or answering service.
- The SSN provided is the same as that submitted by other persons opening an account or other customers.
- The address or telephone number provided is the same as or similar to the account number [sic] or telephone number submitted by an unusually large number of other persons opening accounts or other customers.
- The person opening the covered account or the customer fails to provide all required personal[ly] identifying information on an application or in response to notification that the application is incomplete.
- Personal[ly] identifying information provided is not consistent with personal[ly] identifying information that is on file with [the University/unit].
- For [units] that use challenge questions, the person opening the covered account or the customer cannot provide authenticating information beyond that which generally would be available from a wallet or consumer report.
|
|
Notice from customers, victims of identity theft, law enforcement authorities, or other persons regarding possible identity theft in connection with covered accounts held by [the University/unit]
|
- [The University/unit] is notified by a customer, a victim of identity theft, a law enforcement authority, or any other person that [the University/unit] has opened a fraudulent account for a person engaged in identity theft.
|
Who To Ask
Direct any questions to the Red Flags Steering Committee at rfsc@uillinois.edu.
Last Updated: June 3, 2011